The
Spiritual Nativity - 20 July 1966
The
spiritual nativity is founded on the physiological and psychological
perspectives, and it is something that I myself came to after having worked for
some time along the lines of embryology. Someone reminded me of certain
references in Human and Cosmic Thought to the fact that the actual
nativity was not as important as the spiritual nativity of the human being,
which is described there in connection with the world conceptions and human
soul moods.
The
movements of the planets through the zodiacal constellations are like
physiological processes of human thinking. Brain resistance results in a kind
of brain engraving, whereby the cosmic thinking of the Gods is similar, but
more vast. The eternal cosmos is like a brain. The movements that the planets
describe through this cosmos are similar to human thinking; they are the
external reflection of the thinking of the Gods. Rudolf Steiner gives precise
descriptions relating to world conception moods in Human and Cosmic Thought.
Ram relates to philosophical Idealism, Bull to philosophical Rationalism, Twins
to Mathematism, Crab Materialism, Lion to Sensualism, Virgin to Phenomenalism,
Scales to Realism, Scorpion to Dynamism, Archer to Monadism, Goat to
Spiritualism, Waterman to Pneumatism, and Fishes to Psychism. Materialism is
necessary as a phase in the cosmic economy, because we must make our stand on
matter to maintain our existence.
These
twelve moods are reflected in the constellations, and Dr. Steiner points out
how these can be modified by the “colorings” of Saturn. Saturn is connected
with the working out of karma. It relates to Gnosticism, which stands on the
“borders” of clairvoyance. Therefore Gnosticism in Mathematism relates to
Saturn in the Twins, and is the external reflection of this aspect. Someone
evolving this concept can penetrate through Gnosticism into the secrets of the
mathematical world order. This capacity of the human being to evolve world
conceptions, through participating in the thinking of the Gods before birth, is
demonstrated by Rudolf Steiner in this lecture course: “We must not only
distinguish twelve various shades of world outlook, which are at rest round the
circle, but we must recognize that in each of these shades a quite special mood
of human soul is possible. One can specially cultivate each of these seven
world-outlook moods and each of them can exist in one or the other shades.” The
twelve shades of world outlook refer to the constellations, the moods to the
planets. “Thus we have an external picture in the cosmos for the relations of
our seven world-outlook moods to our twelve shades of world outlook.”
Rudolf
Steiner introduced Jupiter-Logism (the others being: Mars-Voluntarism,
Sun-Empiricism, Venus-Mysticism, Mercury-Transcendentalism, and Moon-Occultism)
in one of the twelve world concepts (or shades), which we can compare to
Fichte’s Jupiter in Fishes (sign Aries). Logism is that coloring, or tendency,
which Hegel or Fichte developed in pure logical thinking — a world conception
in the terms of pure logical argument.
Schopenhauer
in Voluntarism sees the world as the outcome of will forces (for Voluntarism
represents the will) in connection with Fishes — Psychism.
Rudolf
Steiner describes various spiritual nativities and explains why Nietzsche could
not evolve Mathematism, as he simply hadn’t an affinity toward it. In school he
was an excellent pupil in all but mathematics. He could not break through to
what he should have achieved, and this is what caused his final difficulties.
The
spiritual nativity is built right into the bones of the human organism. Dr.
Steiner does not tell us how to handle this aspect, for he always leaves us a
question to solve in the relationship between the spiritual and external
cosmos. However, he does say that the spiritual nativity is much more
important. Therefore, I have tried to find out through the manifestations in
the external cosmos, such as we have studied previously.
The Moon is the last stage of human descent to Earth.
Remember that this is a reflection of spiritual reality, and that it is the
memory picture of what happened spiritually when Shakespeare incarnated. The
details explain how he entered incarnation. We are shown that he came in from
the direction of Aries (where the Moon is situated at birth). At a certain
moment, the soul is still identical with the spheres, and one might see this
moment (right) as a convergence toward the
Earth
center to collect its forces from the periphery and then concentrate them on
that point at birth, which is the direction of its incarnation.
Let
us study Shakespeare’s chart to find his spiritual nativity. This is from the
geocentric viewpoint. Saturn and Jupiter are conjunct in Cancer throughout his
prenatal development. Mars is in Gemini, Venus is in Taurus — this is
associated with the cosmic larynx and with the artist using the cosmic larynx.
The Moon is waxing and conjunct the Sun in Aries, and Mercury is in Pisces.
We
will now add a cosmic cycle that symbolically chronicles certain facts of
incarnation, and this is the Moon node. These are similar to the planetary
nodes and are due to a deviation of the sphere of the Moon, which tilts its
path so that it cuts the ecliptic at two points, giving us the ascending and
descending nodes. The planetary nodes are stable for thousands of years and
orientated toward certain constellations, but the Moon nodes turn; the whole
Moon orbit twists around so that the nodes move with it.
In
this case, the descending node was close to Mars (related to the capacity for
speech), so that the whole capacity of Mars comes through the Moon node. These
nodes are the points of contact with the ecliptic plane of the Earth, and the
line through which these nodes point to Mars represents a gateway opening into
an extra-lunar world, that is, into the astral element of the universe. The
Moon represents vitality, and the water economy of the Earth. It is the vessel
for the life forces. Symbolically, it says that the Mars forces can enter this
organization very strongly.
The
Moon nodes move counter-clockwise, so that the Moon node must have been with
Venus in the Bull shortly after birth. Rudolf Steiner states that a spiritual
nativity can take place before or after birth, but is not identical with it
(see Human and Cosmic Thought).
Shakespeare was born in 1564. Now we are going back to
1539, which is 25 years before birth, to the Moon node. We take the whole orbit
in order to find a suitable Moon node, and we find it in 1539 in Aries. A few
years prior to the birth, it had been there before, but it was not the one for
us. It did not give us the information we required which was congenial to
Shakespeare. A study of his biography gives us the impression of a tremendous
astral background, whereby he was able to dive, so to speak, into the history
of individual biographies, with full self-identification. We sense, in his
case, a knowledge both of initiation and of nature processes.
We
do not reach such conclusions through calculation alone, but we unite spiritual
intuition with a knowledge of external rhythms. We need both. In 1539 we have
Uranus going into Leo with Pluto opposite in Aquarius (actual opposition in
1540). The preceding conjunction had been in 1457, just prior to the Chymical
Wedding in 1459. The spiritual nativity is a whole complex, of which this is
only a part. The conjunction of 1457 could be referred to as a bud, and the
opposition of 1540 a blossoming, an opening-up for humanity to unfold. This is
seen very clearly in Shakespeare, as the alchemy of the
Rosicrucians.
All
this was built into the organism of Shakespeare (see diagram above). See how
close this Uranus and Pluto opposition is to the Great Conjunction in
Shakespeare’s chart. This would seem to be spiritually prearranged, as though
this conjunction has been made use of by the organism for its fulfillment. We
might call Shakespeare’s biography an amalgam of the alchemy of history and
biography. This is a reflection of the spiritual nativity. The Great
Conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in Cancer would seem to refer to the cosmic wisdom
of chronology and history.
If I find I have some intuition, or idea, with regard
to Shakespeare, for instance, it is the application of this cosmology that
gives it backbone. Here, we might say that the constellation of Lion
(Sensualism in Shakespeare, referring to the occult) is submerged in the
characteristics of Waterman (Pneumatism — the teaching about the Spirit).
Spiritism distinguishes spiritual beings; and Waterman as the highest
manifestation of Pneumatism, can still do this; but not individually, more as a
swarm of bees. The next chart we will study is Goethe’s, who was born in 1749.
His Sun was in Leo, as was Mercury. Venus was in Virgo, Saturn in Libra,
Jupiter in Pisces, Mars in Sagittarius, and the Moon nodes in Sagittarius and
Twins.
The
Moon was waning, making the direction of incarnation opposite. We have to find
this spiritual nativity by following the Moon node and then go forward. In
1793, the ascending Moon node was in Leo, and the gateway opened. In 1793, also
Uranus was in the same position, with Pluto opposite. This opposition (of Pluto
and Uranus) was in the same place as in 1712 — the time of Rousseau’s birth,
and associated with Goethe’s nativity, though we must leave this point for the
moment. Here again the background is that of the Rosicrucian Impulse streaming
through history, with one of the foci for this incarnation.
In
1793 Goethe met Schiller. He had returned from Italy and entered into a
productive phase. But he needed Schiller to push him. When they first met he
found Schiller too mercurial and rejected him. It was only after they met,
later on, on the way home from a gathering, and had entered Goethe’s house
together to shelter from a storm, that they really came together. It was then
that Goethe produced his idea of the archetypal plant, which Schiller referred
to as “only an idea”, to which Goethe replied that he was indeed fortunate in
being able to visualize his ideas. From then on, he was always encouraged to
publish his works by Schiller. One of these publications was the Legend of
the Green Snake and the Beautiful Lily (a Rosicrucian impulse). He was
always guided very deliberately to reach his culminations, e.g., The Legend and
his Leipzig experience. We find this same deliberation in his spiritual
nativity and its realization. This can be a most potent perspective of our
connection with the stars.
In
the ephemeris we can find the positions of the Moon nodes, but they can be at
least a month off from their correct positions. One needs extra tables, which I
think are as yet unpublished in this country. The slower planets are not so
much concerned, but one needs precise calculations with reference to the Moon
nodes.
We can find this kind of spiritual nativity in other
examples such as Ralph Waldo Emerson. Here we find Saturn in Leo at birth, Mars
in Cancer close to the Moon, Sun and Mercury in Taurus (born, May 25), Venus in
Aries, and Moon nodes in Aquarius and Leo. The line of incarnation came via
Cancer, and his Moon node of 1793 was close to Goethe’s Moon node of 1795 and
also close to that opposition of Uranus and Pluto already mentioned. Emerson
was one of the greatest individualities of the 19th century.
We notice here a deep connection with Goethe. Many people called him the
transcendentalist (beyond the physical), to which he objected. But he had a
deep spiritual insight. One has the impression that before incarnation he had
some connection with Goethe’s Legend, and carried it forward as a kind
of unconscious guiding beacon for his work, although he was not a Rosicrucian.
The
conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter give the background of his embryonic
development, as a reflection of the Saturn and Pluto opposition to which we
have referred in previous studies.
This
is a very rapid journey through the huge complex of the spiritual nativity. I
can only give you (here as elsewhere) the general guiding lines on our travels
through the cosmos in the short time we have at our disposal. Not with the
exactitude of a mechanical computer, for the cosmic rhythms are much more
flexible, but with a remarkable accuracy, even so, in relation to the varying
aspects that we have studied this week. We can only hope that more work can be
done to confirm what we have dealt with this morning. It is very feasible that
this spiritual nativity makes a much deeper impact on a human being than the
physical, and that from it we shall obtain much more information of its
connections with the spiritual world.